LGBT Studies Leadership Grade Template 1. Preparation: The leaders did their homework, were organized, and covered the material in a logical manner.0 . . . 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 not at all accomplished unsatisfactory some problems good excellent 2. On Topic: The leaders stayed faithful to the topic (permitting that discussion often ventures into other related areas). The session provided new insights about the topic.0 . . . 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 not at all accomplished unsatisfactory some problems good excellent 3. Effectiveness: The leaders clearly understood the content of the week’s material. The assertions and findings in the reading material were faithfully represented. Criticisms of the readings were based on defensible arguments targeting actual assertions and findings in the readings.0 . . . 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 not at all accomplished unsatisfactory some problems good excellent 4. Helpfulness: The leaders did a good job of helping me to understand the material better.0 . . . 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up
access the rest of the document.
This note was uploaded on 09/08/2010 for the course SOCI 172 at San Jose State University .