RD3-allow cannabalism(GOV2)

RD3-allow cannabalism(GOV2) - This House should allow...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Government Brief: Cannibalism Resolution: This House should allow cannibalism in extreme cases Need background information. Something to get us thinking about cannibalism and extreme cases. 1. Definitive Issues (Resolutional Analysis) a. Definitions of key terms i. Key terms in the resolution: 1. Cannibalism a. The practice of eating the flesh of your own kind i. wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn 2. Extreme a. Going to great or exaggerated lengths i. http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/extreme b. Criterion for debate i. I like that you are interpreting this as a value debate; however, to do this effectively, you need to offer a VALUE. For example … in this debate, we will uphold the value of survival. ii. The Government will win this debate by showing the reasoning for cannibalism to be allowed in extreme cases where survival is the goal through our contentions 2. Designative Issues (Contentions) a. Death is seen as an extreme case, and cannibalism should be allowed after death in extreme cases.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/08/2010 for the course COMM 140P at San Jose State University .

Page1 / 3

RD3-allow cannabalism(GOV2) - This House should allow...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online