Unformatted text preview: which it is a part.” Determine how he answers the parts of this question. 3. How does Camenisch argue his position? Answer this by indicating at least 2 premises. 4. Argue for or against Camenisch’s position. If you agree, specifically state why you agree and explain. Do not just state, “I agree.” You need to say why and discuss your reasons for agreement and why his position is logical and right. If you argue against him, you need at least two premises to support your argument. You need to be specific to your points and why your points are logical and right. Make sure in either case you are clear. Use his premises and points to argue against or defend him. 5. Conclude. Your conclusion may include any pertinent comments from you as well as summarize what you did in this essay....
View Full Document
- Paul F. Camenisch, Giddings office FOB