{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Ratio and root tests

Ratio and root tests - 12 4 The Root and Ratio Tests.‘ Fe...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–8. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 4
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 6
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 8
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 12. 4 The Root and Ratio Tests '..‘ Fe}; 1:. The root and ratio tests are amongst the most powerful tests. They are both based on comparing a given series to a geometric series Ens". Recall that the geometric series converges for iml < 1 and diverges for |:1:[ 2 1. Observe too that lim (risky/k [fit—700 =15. Theorem 12.4.1 (Page 593 of SHE) The Root Test Let 0.1g 2 0 for all k. Assume that lim al/k=p. k—roo (a) If p < 1, Zak converges. (b) If p > 1, Eek diverges. (If p = 1, the test is inconclusive). Proof (a) We assume ,0 < 1. Choose 11. such that p<p<1. For sufficiently large k, we have milk<p => ck < 111“. Since (0 <);1 < I, E 15’“ is a convergent geometric series. By the basic comparison test, 2 a]: converges. (b) is similar. I Remark We often use the root test when our terms a]; are of the form something raised to a kth power. Example 1 Test for convergence SO k 1/}: lim cal/k lim i k—boo k k—mo 111k , 1 [claim—“1 By the root test, k EEK; = 2 (milk) converges. Example 2 Test for convergence kmo 3k Solution Here kmo Gk — W 19100 1/»’c 1 I: kmo/k : 3 (kl/k)100 = -——3——. Recall that lim 331/9“ = 1 => klim 191/,“ = 1. m—J'OO #00 So fim lfk _ 1' (k1/k)100 _ 1 < 1 Jar-+00 Gk H4 kings 3 ~ 3 ' By the root test, the series kIOO ZR}; 2 Z @- converges. Example 3 Test for convergence 216“. 59 Example 3 Test for convergence Zkk. Solution Here Ogle/k =k—roo,k——roo. That is [)2 lirn ailk=oo>L law—’00 By the root test, the series diverges. The root test works well with powers. The ratio test works well with facto- rials: Theorem 12.4.2 (Page 595 of SHE) The Ratio Test Let (1;; > 0 for all 16. Suppose that lim ““1 = A. J‘s—«+00 G}; (a) If A < 1, then Eek converges. (b) If A > 1, then 205;. diverges. (If A = 1, the test is inconclusive). Proof One uses the basic comparison test, showing, very roughly1 that 04; is compara— ble to A’“. I Example Test for convergence 4k "is? Solution Here 4]: [Bk 3 so 4k+1 4k ak-i-l/ak = [(k-l—lfll-H] k! 2 4 (k + 1)' 1 . = 4—. k + 1 Then 4 saw = .122. m = 0 <1- 60 By the ratio test, the series converges. Example Test for convergence (3k)! 2 100K Solution Here _ (3k)! “k _ look so (3 (k + 1))! (3k)! “HI/“’4 : mow/W _ (31: + 3)! 100’“ _ (3k)! 100Ic+1 1 = k _ (3 + 3) (3k + 2)(3k + 1) 100 —> 00,16: —> 00. That is, lim ak+1/ak = 00 > 1. k—roo By the ratio test, the series diverges. SUMMARY OF TESTS SO FAR We have been dealing with series 2 a}: with positive terms. (I) Usually, when a series has terms with powers, e.g. 2k k2 21+?6 or 227 but no factorials, we use the root test. (II) When there are also factorials, e.g. 4!: Zn, we use the ratio test. (III) When the terms have the form of a numerator and denominator with powers of k, e.g., Z W2 + 2 4k? 4- x/E ’ we use the limit comparison test (or basic comparison test) and compare to a p—series Z [cl—P. 61 12.5 Absolute, Conditional Con- vergence So far we have dealt mainly with series with positive terms. Now we study series Zak where different terms may have different signs. Very often, we can reduce this to studying Z Iakl . Definition Absolute Convergence If E jak| converges, then we say that Zak converges absolutely. The reason is that this is useful is: Theorem 12.5.1 (page 597 of SHE) Absolute convergence implies con- vergence If Zions] converges, then Zak converges. Proof Now —|le S are S lakl #OSak+lak| S2|akl. By the comprison test, since 2 |ak| converges, also 2 (2 |ak|) = 2 E |ak| eonw verges, so Z: (a;c + lak|) converges. Then Zak = Z[(ak+lakl)—»lakll = ZWHGkD-Zlakl is a difference of two convergent series, so Eek converges. I Example Show that if p > 1, , k i (— 1) converges. kl" [0:1 62 Solution Here k (—1) - 1 Gk: kp‘:]aki:g;' As p > 1, we know that DO 00 1 Z Iakl = E E converges. Ic=1 k=1 That is, °° °° (—1)‘° Z (1;, = Z: converges absolutely, and so converges. k? k=1 lc=1 Remark We shall soon see that for any 19 > 0 00 I: Z( 1) converges, even though it does not converge absolutely for p S 1. We shall call this condi— tional convergence: Definition Conditional Convergence Suppose that 2 oh converges, but Zlak} diverges. Then we say that 2 a1, converges conditionally. Theorem 12.5.3 (Page 598 of SHE) Alternating Series Test Let me > 0 for k 2 0. Assume that (i) {ck} is a decreasing sequence, i.e. no 2 al 2 a2 2 ...; (ii) lim ilk = 0. k—rroo . Then Do 2 (—4)!“ (1k converges. k=0 Remark We call series of this form alternating series. Idea of Proof 63 The series converges because succesive terms cancel one another, due to opposite sign. There is a beautifui proof in SHE: Let m 2 1, and consider 32m, the even order partial sum. We see that 2m 2 (—1)ka k=0 = (a0 — £11) + (a2 - a3) + + (a2mv2 m a2m—1)+ 62m- 52m Here each term in brackets, namely 00 — G1; 82 — as; ---; Gem—2 r a2me1 is positive (recafl r11 < a0 and (13 < (12 etc). So 32m>0form21. On the other hand, _1)2m+1 32m+2 E 32m + ( fl2m+1 + a2m+2 = 82m '- a2m+1 + a2m+2 < 32m: since a2m+1 > a2m+2. Thus {5%,} is a decreasing sequence of positive numbers. As it is bounded below (by 0), we have lim 82m = L Til—>00 for some L > 0. Then also the odd order partial sums converge to the same limit: 2m+1 S2m+1 = 52m+('—1) a2m+1 52m _“ aZm+1- Hence lim 32m+1 = lim (82m ” 32m+1) 773‘qu m—‘OO : L — 0 = L. Hence hm sm = L. m—roo I Example Let p > O. Showr that °° Hf“ 2 hp converges. k=1 64 For which 39 > 0 does it converge absolutely? For which p > 0 does it converge conditionally? Solution llere 00 _1k £8; has the form 00 2 (-Uk We: 16:1 Where 1 a5, 2 E is positive, decreasing (as k increases) and I 13520 Gk E 0‘ By the alternating series test, °° (—lr °° 2 k1” = Z (—1)"c a}, converges. [6:1 k=1 We already saw that for p > 1, the series converges absolutely. If p 5 1, then 00 00 1 Z ‘(—l)kekl : 2 E)- diverges, k=1 Ic=1 as it is a p—series, with p S 1. Thus 00 (_ 1)}: 2 k1” converges conditionally for p g l. k=1 Summary When you see a series with terms having alternating sign, you can try apply the alternating series test, provided you can easily check that the terms decrease in magnitude, and have limit 0. In many cases, however, it is easier to take absolute values, and test for absolute convergence. If there is absolute conver— gence, then there is convergence. 65 ...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}