Tutorial 11 Solutions 2009

Tutorial 11 Solutions 2009 - EFN406 1 TUTORIAL ELEVEN...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
EFN406 1 TUTORIAL ELEVEN Tutorial 11 Questions 1. BF page 714 Questions 1, 2, 5, 8, 10 and 12 2. BF page 715 Problems 1, 7 and 8 Tutorial 11 Solutions 1. BF page 730 Questions 1, 2, 5, 8, 10 and 12 BF, Q1 On the information given, Diana’s business appears to be entirely domestic—that is, all costs and revenues will be in Australian dollars. Any influence from the exchange rate would be very indirect. In short, Diana faces minimal exchange rate risk. However, if she borrows US dollars, she will expose her business to exchange rate risk. If the Australian dollar depreciates against the US dollar, then the US dollar interest payments, measured in Australian dollar terms, will increase. Borrowing US dollars will therefore increase risk. Is it likely to increase returns (by reducing costs)? If the borrowing is hedged using the forward rate, the risk will be eliminated, but interest rate parity implies that the cost advantage will also be eliminated. Interest rate parity is supported by empirical evidence. If the borrowing is left unhedged, then the international Fisher effect implies that no cost advantage can be expected on average. Although the empirical evidence does not support the international Fisher effect, this does not imply that the risk-expected return trade off is attractive. BF, Q2 Yes, it is possible for a currency to trade at a forward premium (or discount) for one time period and simultaneously at a forward discount (or premium) for a different time period. For any given time period, the forward premium or discount is due simply to the interest rate differential for that time period. The interest rate differential could be positive for one time period and negative for another. BF, Q5 Purchasing power parity maintains that relative exchange rates adjust to reflect relative inflation rates in different countries. Factors that inhibit international trade may tend to inhibit the achievement of purchasing power parity. Such factors include the presence of non-traded goods, transport costs, tariffs and quotas. BF, Q8 The basic rule in this type of case is to centralise (or at least to coordinate) the activities of the various subsidiaries. For example, through their export activities, Maple Leaf may acquire a claim to receive a future cash flow in US dollars at the same time as Bald Eagle has a claim to receive a cash flow in Canadian dollars. Left to themselves, Maple Leaf will be converting US dollars to Canadian dollars while simultaneously, Bald Eagle will be converting Canadian dollars to US dollars. Obviously, there will be a saving in
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/15/2010 for the course BUSINESS 406 taught by Professor John during the Three '10 term at Queensland Tech.

Page1 / 6

Tutorial 11 Solutions 2009 - EFN406 1 TUTORIAL ELEVEN...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online