Alt2 - DDW 09 Tony, Sohan, Cherndawg CAPITALISM KRITIK...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
DDW 09 Tony, Sohan, Cherndawg CAPITALISM KRITIK 1NC Link – Marx Providing social services explicitly undermines the economic balance of capitalism. Bill Jordan , Dept. Social Work – U. Plymouth, Journal of Social Policy, “Public Services and the Service Economy: Individualism and the Choice Agenda”, 35:143-162, 2006 , Cambridge U. Press Much as the original justifications of property and markets focused on the production of commodities, so did the critique of liberal political economy. Two fundamental criticisms of capitalism were common to Marxian (Marx, 1867), Guild Socialist (Cole, 1920, 1927; Reckitt and Bechhofer, 1918) and underconsumptionist (Hobson, 1900; Douglas, 1919, 1920) political mobilisations. First, the criteria by which finance capital chose to invest in productive industry were derived entirely from the prospect of profit, and not at all from human needs ; rentiers were totally unaccountable to citizens, or to industrial stakeholders. Second, industrial production involved the extraction of value from workers which yielded profit, but their wages were insufficient for them to purchase the goods they produced . Although they disagreed about the exact mechanisms behind these injustices, their remedies all involved some combination of state ownership, fiscal and monetary management, and income redistribution (Hutchinson and Burkitt, 1997; Hutchinson et al., 2002). This focus on public finance and the processes of factory production meant that socialist revolutions and social democratic reforms targeted the property of the rich and the power of industrialists, leaving the consequences for private services to work themselves out. But as part of their new designs for societies, they created a more collectivised, planned and regulated social environment, which balanced the productive side of the economy. Public services expressed the goals of solidarity, security and justice . They were ‘designed to widen and deepen the expression of the spirit of democratic co-operation’, practising in a ‘more equalitarian spirit’, with professional workers dealing with citizens in ‘a democratic way consistent with the spirit of the times’ (Cole, 1945: 29). So the aims of collectivised services were explicitly political and social ; there was little economic theory to inform their creation. The second-most quoted text in Beveridge's great works (after Keynes), A. C. Pigou's The Economics of Welfare (1920) contained no references to health or education services. In the state socialist countries this political purpose was even more pronounced, reflected in the programmes and priorities of public services, and proclaimed by insignia and banners throughout the built environment. Professionals in state services under both ideological systems were acculturated through training, and co-opted through career incentives, to sustain these ideologies. In this way, the public services became an important instrument throughout which political elites spread the
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 58

Alt2 - DDW 09 Tony, Sohan, Cherndawg CAPITALISM KRITIK...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online