Chapter4slides - Chapter 4 Chapter Torts What is a tort?...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Chapter 4 Chapter Torts What is a tort? What • A civil wrong, entitling the victim to civil compensation compensation • Not a crime, though often occurs in Not connection with one connection • Recovery is based on the damage to the Recovery plaintiff plaintiff • Based on common law 2 General types General • Intentional – Many specific ones • Unintentional (2 categories) – Negligence-“fault” involved • Unlimited circumstances • Very general requirements – Strict Liability-fault not an issue Intentional Torts Intentional • • • • Each has its own requirements Assault Battery False imprisonment – Usually not in a prison • Intentional Infliction-Emotional Distress Defamation Defamation • Libel=Written, Slander=Spoken • Requirements(all needed) – False statement – Factual in nature – Communicated to 3rd party – Injury to reputation • Actual monetary loss often must be Actual proven in slander proven Privileged Communications Privileged • No defamation liability if privilege applies • Absolute – Court proceedings – In legislative debate • Qualified – Private interest related to the statement • Public Figures: Intent (actual malice) must be Public proven to recover proven Invasion of Privacy Invasion • Tort here, invasion is by private party, Tort not the government not • Truth is not a defense Truth not • Appropriation – Vanna White case • Intrusion into private affairs • Public disclosure of private info Wrongful interference with contract contract • Tort to induce other to breach a contract • Usually must be a specific causal Usually connection connection • Predatory behavior by business Predatory generally generally Unintentional Torts = Unintentional Negligence • Unlimited situations • Usually involves accidental Usually carelessness that injures another carelessness • Can recover only if all 5 requirements Can are met are Palsgraff case; p. 109 Palsgraff • Railroad conductor helped passenger Railroad onto departing train onto • Violated a work rule in doing so • Caused passenger to drop package Caused wrapped in newspaper wrapped • Fireworks in package exploded • Scales in a distant part of the station fell Scales onto Ms. Palsgraff onto Palsgraff Issues Palsgraff • • • Who would Ms. Palsgraff sue? Who engaged in “bad” conduct? Why did RR have rule against helping Why passengers onto trains once they started moving? started • What should conductor consider before What doing so? doing Negligence Elements Negligence • • • • Duty Breach of that duty Injury Actual Causation – “but for” test – Would it have happened anyway? • Proximate Causation – Foreseeability Defenses Defenses • Defendant wins if can prove defense Defendant even if plaintiff has proven the 5 elements elements • Assumption of risk • Superseding cause or event Other defenses Other • Contributory negligence – All or nothing – Any plaintiff negligence eliminated ability to Any recover—harsh recover—harsh • Comparative – most state now use this – Plaintiff’s recovery reduced in proportion to Plaintiff’s plaintiff’s relative fault plaintiff’s Negligence issues Negligence • • • • • Res Ipsa Loquitur Negligence per se Danger invites rescue doctrine Good Samaritan laws Dram Shop Acts Strict Liability Strict • Liability without fault • Even if very careful, still responsible for Even injuries injuries • 3 circumstances – Wild animals – Use of explosives – Product liability (will study in later chapter) Online Defamation Online • ISPs and commercial websites • Liable for content of postings by Liable members? members? • Generally not; courts tend to find that Generally there is no liability there ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/22/2010 for the course BUSINESS 3000 taught by Professor Jayballantine during the Fall '10 term at Colorado.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online