CI_hyptest_proof

CI_hyptest_proof - You may be wondering why we claim that...

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: You may be wondering why we claim that “we reject H 0 in a two-tailed test with significance level α ” and “the (1 − α ) × 100% confidence interval does not contain µ0 (or D0 ) ” are equivalent statements. Here is an algebraic proof that the two statements are the same: First, we start with the statement, “we reject H 0 in a two-tailed test with significance level α . ” For a z-test, this means that zobs > zα 2 . Substituting in the equation for zobs , we have: x − µ0 > zα 2 σn Since σ n is always positive, we have the following two possible scenarios, depending on whether x − µ0 is positive or negative: − ( x − µ0 ) x − µ0 > zα 2 or > zα 2 σn σn Rearranging these two inequalities, we have: x − µ0 > zα 2 σ n or − ( x − µ0 ) > zα 2 σ n − µ0 > − x + zα 2 σ n or − x + µ0 > zα 2 σ n n n The last statement says that µ0 is outside the (1 − α ) × 100% confidence interval constructed around x . Therefore we have proven the original claim for a z-test, and the proof for a t-test is similar. µ0 < x − zα 2 σ or µ0 > x + zα 2 σ ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/24/2010 for the course STATS 13a taught by Professor Chen during the Spring '10 term at UCLA.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online