{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

2005 p 333 66 2005 fischer lorraine l no animals were

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: rst Transgenic Animal Escaped Regulation MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, v. 6, p. 457-504 (2005) Coxwell, Will The Case for Strengthening Alabama’s Animal Cruelty Laws LAW AND PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, v. 29, p. 187-95 (2005) Favre, David S. Judicial Recognition of the Interests of Animals – A New Tort MICHIGAN STATE LAW REVIEW, v. 2005, p. 333-66 (2005) Fischer, Lorraine L. “No Animals Were Harmed . . .”: Protecting Chimpanzees From Cruelty Behind the Curtain HASTINGS COMMUNICATIONS AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL, v. 27 n. 2, p. 405-41 (2005) Huss, Rebecca J. Recent Developments in Animal Law TORT TRIAL & INSURANCE PRACTICE LAW JOURNAL, v. 40 n. 2, p. 233-49 (2005) Kreuziger, Colin Dismembering the Meat Industry Piece by Piece: The Value of Federalism to Farm Animals LAW & INEQUALITY, v. 23, p. 363-405 (2005) Kreuziger, Colin The Value of Federalism to Farm Animals LAW & INEQUALITY, v. 23 n. 2, p. 363-405 (2005) Seymour, Jullaine Who Can Be Harassed? Claims against Animal Rights Protestors under Section 3 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 THE CAMBRIDGE...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online