Unformatted text preview: I also believe that debits and credit are always good to use to make needed account adjustments. D3. Do you believe the REA enter ontology provides a valid theoretical foundation for ERP software? Explain why or why not. I do not think that the REA enterprise ontology provides a valid theoretical foundation for the ERP software as the ERP software deals the debits, credit and general ledger accounts and an REA enterprise ontology does not. Also The REA and ERP have significantly different structuring orientation and most base object that are used in one are not used in the other. D4. Can you think of an alternative pattern to use as a structuring orientation for enterprise systems? Describe the components of your pattern and specify any rules you can identify for the behavior of those components. ERP software packages do not exhibit pattern-based design, but as an alternative attempts to build industry “best of breed” into the software....
View Full Document
- Summer '10
- general ledger accounts, REA enterprise ontology