6F 111 Investments Performance Evaluation

6F 111 Investments Performance Evaluation - 6F:111...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 6F:111 Investments Professor Gerry Suchanek PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: How well do managed funds perform; i.e. How well do fund mgrs. & their mgt. groups perform. How Returns are Measured: 1. Geometric Avg. w/Compounding 2. Arithmetic Avg. Simple Avg, No Compounding Notes: (1) Geometric Avgs. < Arithmetic Avgs. Always . (= only when no variation in returns.) (2) Arithmetic Avg. Exceeds Geometric Avg. by aprprox. the variance of returns. (3) The Arithmetic Avg. is an Unbiased predictor of future returns; The Geometric Avg. is a Downward biased predictor of future returns. Other Issues: (1) time-weights vs. Dollar-weight Return Measures. (2) Weighted Avg. of Arithmetic Avg. & Geometric Avg. of returns to predict future portfolio values for investment horizon, H, given a historical estimation period, T: A. Avg. x - T H 1 + G. Avg x T H PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS 1. Use Time-Weighted Returns: Considers only period-by-period returns, & uses arithmetic Avgs. 2. Adjust for risk to obtain meaningful comparisons. Do this by defining alternative investment comparison universes , where each universe consists of funds having similar risk characterics....
View Full Document

Page1 / 5

6F 111 Investments Performance Evaluation - 6F:111...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online