This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Lecture 10 We begin todays lecture with a simple claim. Claim. Let Q R n be a rectangle and f, g : Q R be bounded functions such that f g . Then Q f Q g. (3.49) Proof. Let P be a partition of Q , and let R be a rectangle belonging to P . Clearly, m R ( f ) m R ( g ), so L ( f, P ) = m R ( f ) v ( R ) (3.50) R L ( g, P ) = m R ( g ) v ( R ) (3.51) R = L ( f, P ) L ( g, P ) g, (3.52) Q for all partitions P . The lower integral f (3.53) Q is the l.u.b. of L ( f, P ), so g. (3.54) f Q Q Similarly, g. (3.55) f Q Q It follows that if f g , then g. (3.56) f Q Q This is the monotonicity property of the R. integral. 3.4 Fubini Theorem In onedimensional calculus, when we have a continuous function f : [ a, b ] R , then we can calculate the R. integral b f ( x ) dx = F ( b ) F ( a ) , (3.57) a 1 where F is the antiderivative of f . When we integrate a continuous function f : Q R over a twodimensional region, say Q = [ a 1 , b 1 ] [ a 2 , b 2 ], we can calculate the R. integral b 1 b 2 b 1 b 2 f = f ( x, y ) dxdy = f ( x, y ) dxdy (3.58) Q a 1 a 2 a 1 a 2 That is, we can break up Q into components and integrate separately over those components. We make this more precise in the following Fubini Theorem. components....
View Full
Document
 Fall '04
 unknown

Click to edit the document details