{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

1_For DTCA as medicalisation - Mintzes

1_For DTCA as medicalisation - Mintzes - Education and...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
For and against Direct to consumer advertising is medicalising normal human experience In direct to consumer advertising, drug companies target advertisements for prescription drugs directly at the public. Barbara Mintzes argues that this type of advertising risks medicalising normal human conditions, with the drug companies raking in increasingly healthy profits. Silvia N Bonaccorso and Jeffrey L Sturchio argue that, through advertising, drug companies can enable patients to make better informed choices about their health and treatment FOR In October 2001, GlaxoSmithKline ran an advertisement in the New York Times Magazine for paroxetine (known as Paxil in the United States). A woman is walking on a crowded street, her face strained, in a crowd otherwise blurred. The head- line reads, “Millions suffer from chronic anxiety. Millions could be helped by Paxil.” No doubt many New Yorkers felt anxious in the aftermath of the attack on the World Trade Center, experiencing symptoms highlighted in the advertise- ment, such as worry, anxiety, or irritability. At what point does an understandable response to distressing life events become an indication for drug treatment and a market opportunity? Kawachi and Conrad describe medicalisation as a “process by which non-medical problems become defined and treated as medical problems, usually in terms of illnesses and disorders,” decontextualizing human problems and turning attention from the social environment to the individual.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}