4_Rier - HIV and Morality Online

4_Rier - HIV and Morality Online - 1046 David A. Rier Yet...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1046 David A. Rier © 2007 The Author Yet disclosure’s actual value is controversial. When asked, seropositives may mistakenly declare themselves seronegative: their HIV test may have been performed during the post- infection window period when the virus was not easily detectable, or prior to subsequent infection. Clearly, the many seropositives unaware of their status (CDC 2006) are ill-equipped to disclose. Moreover, as the data below indicate, seropositives may knowingly deny their status when asked. Also, though those who consistently disclose may engage in fewer high- risk activities, this relationship is complex (Parsons et al. 2005). If both partners are HIV+, for example, disclosure can be used to justify unprotected relations, despite risk of reinfec- tion or other sexually-transmitted diseases (STDs) (Simoni and Pantalone 2004, Sheon and Crosby 2004, Serovich and Mosack 2003). Some thus conclude that disclosure should not
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/10/2010 for the course ENG 000121 taught by Professor Mcgrand during the Spring '10 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Ask a homework question - tutors are online