6_Tyranny of Diagnosis - Charles Rosenberg

6_Tyranny of Diagnosis - Charles Rosenberg - The Tyranny f...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The Tyranny of Diagnosis such named disease pictures have always been important to practitioners of medicine. In the often-cited language of Knud Faber's classic (1923) history of nosography, the clinician "cannot live, cannot speak or act without the concept of morbid categories" (vii). A time- and place- specific repertoire of such agreed-upon disease categories has, in fact, always linked laypersons and medical practitioners and thus has served to legitimate and explain the physician's status and healing practice. Mastering a vocabulary of disease pictures and being able to distinguish among them have long been fundamental to the physician's role, as such knowledge underlies the socially indispensable tasks of diagnosis and prognosis and the rationalization of therapeutic practice. "Every one must acknowledge the difficulty of distinguishing dis- eases," argued the influential Edinburgh teacher and practitioner William Cullen in his widely used late 18th-century textbook of nosology,
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/10/2010 for the course ENG 000121 taught by Professor Mcgrand during the Spring '10 term at Cornell.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online