9_Direct to consumer advertising in oncology - Abel et al.

9_Direct to consumer advertising in oncology - Abel et al....

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Abel, Penson, Joffe et al. 225 www.TheOncologist.com Recent Developments In February of 2004, the FDA issued a draft Guidance for Industry regarding the information included in the brief summary portion of direct-to-consumer advertisements [29]. Several pharmaceutical advertisers have responded by changing their practice of reprinting their approved package insert and now include more patient-friendly explanations of possible side effects. The FDA also recently issued Draft Guidances for industry comment purposes on consumer-directed broadcast advertising of restricted medical devices [30], as well as help-seeking and other disease awareness communications by or on behalf of drug and device firms [31]. Such developments, especially the possibility of clearer language for the brief summary, were cautiously applauded, notably in a Janu- ary 2005 perspective piece in The New England Journal of Medicine [32]. In July of 2005, Senator Frist, a former practicing physi- cian, called for a 2-year ban on direct-to-consumer adver- tising and asked for the Government Accounting Office to study the issue. [2] Dr. Frist’s suggestion was not taken
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/10/2010 for the course ENG 000121 taught by Professor Mcgrand during the Spring '10 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Ask a homework question - tutors are online