This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
32
BRUCE K. DRIVER
†
3.
Fully nonlinear first order PDE
In this section let
U
⊂
o
R
n
be an open subset of
R
n
and
(
x, z, p
)
∈
¯
U×
R
n
×
R
→
F
(
x, z, p
)
∈
R
be a
C
2
— function. Actually to simplify notation let us suppose
U
=
R
n
.
We are now looking for a solution
u
:
R
n
→
R
to the fully nonlinear PDE,
(3.1)
F
(
x, u
(
x
)
,
∇
u
(
x
)) = 0
.
As above, we “reduce” the problem to solving ODE’s. To see how this might be
done, suppose
u
solves (3.1) and
x
(
s
)
is a curve in
R
n
and let
z
(
s
)=
u
(
x
(
s
))
and
p
(
s
)=
∇
u
(
x
(
s
))
.
Then
z
0
(
s
)=
∇
u
(
x
(
s
))
·
x
0
(
s
)=
p
(
s
)
·
x
0
(
s
)
and
(3.2)
p
0
(
s
)=
∂
x
0
(
s
)
∇
u
(
x
(
s
))
.
(3.3)
We would now like to
f
nd an equation for
x
(
s
)
which along with the above system
of equations would form and ODE for
(
x
(
s
)
,z
(
s
)
,p
(
s
))
.
The term,
∂
x
0
(
s
)
∇
u
(
x
(
s
))
,
which involves two derivative of
u
is problematic and we would like to replace it by
something involving only
∇
u
and
u.
In order to get the desired relation, di
f
erentiate
Eq. (3.1) in
x
in the direction
v
to
f
nd
0=
F
x
·
v
+
F
z
∂
v
u
+
F
p
·
∂
v
∇
u
=
F
x
·
v
+
F
z
∂
v
u
+
F
p
·
∇
∂
v
u
=
F
x
·
v
+
F
z
∇
u
·
v
+(
∂
F
p
∇
u
)
·
v,
wherein we have used the fact that mixed partial derivative commute. This equation
is equivalent to
(3.4)
∂
F
p
∇
u

(
x,u
(
x
)
,
∇
u
(
x
))
=
−
(
F
x
+
F
z
∇
u
)

(
x,u
(
x
)
,
∇
u
(
x
))
.
By requiring
x
(
s
)
to solve
x
0
(
s
)=
F
p
(
x
(
s
)
,z
(
s
)
,p
(
s
))
,
we
f
nd, using Eq. (3.4) and
Eqs. (3.2) and (3.3) that
(
x
(
s
)
,z
(
s
)
,p
(
s
))
solves the
characteristic equations
,
x
0
(
s
)=
F
p
(
x
(
s
)
,z
(
s
)
,p
(
s
))
z
0
(
s
)=
p
(
s
)
·
F
p
(
x
(
s
)
,z
(
s
)
,p
(
s
))
p
0
(
s
)=
−
F
x
(
x
(
s
)
,z
(
s
)
,p
(
s
))
−
F
z
(
x
(
s
)
,z
(
s
)
,p
(
s
))
p
(
s
)
.
Wew
i
l
linthefutures
imp
lyabbrev
iatetheseequat
ionsby
x
0
=
F
p
z
0
=
p
·
F
p
(3.5)
p
0
=
−
F
x
−
F
z
p.
The above considerations have proved the following Lemma.
Lemma 3.1.
Let
A
(
x, z, p
):=(
F
p
(
x, z, p
)
,p
·
F
p
(
x, z, p
)
,
−
F
x
(
x, z, p
)
−
F
z
(
x, z, p
)
p
)
,
π
1
(
x, z, p
)=
x
and
π
2
(
x, z, p
)=
z.
If
u
solves Eq. (3.1) and
x
0
∈
U,
then
e
sA
(
x
0
,u
(
x
0
)
,
∇
u
(
x
0
)) = (
x
(
s
)
,u
(
x
(
s
))
,
∇
u
(
x
(
s
)))
and
u
(
x
(
s
)) =
π
2
◦
e
sA
(
x
0
,u
(
x
0
)
,
∇
u
(
x
0
))
(3.6)
where
x
(
s
)=
π
1
◦
e
sA
(
x
0
,u
(
x
0
)
,
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentPDE LECTURE NOTES, MATH 237AB
33
We now want to use Eq. (3.6) to produce solutions to Eq. (3.1). As in the
quasilinear case we will suppose
Σ
:
U
⊂
o
R
n
−
1
−→
R
n
is a surface,
Σ
(0) =
x
0
,
D
Σ
(
y
)
is injective for all
y
∈
U
and
u
0
:
Σ
→
R
is given. We wish to solve Eq. (3.1)
for
u
with the added condition that
u
(
Σ
(
y
)) =
u
0
(
y
)
.
In order to make use of Eq.
This is the end of the preview. Sign up
to
access the rest of the document.
 Three '10
 Smith

Click to edit the document details