Factors_influencing_franchisees_performance_in_Nigeria_Chapter2_Part12.docx - 2.3.2.1.3 Control Control refers to extent of franchisees autonomy in the
2.3.2.1.3 ControlControl refers to extent of franchisees autonomy in the management of their outlet. Autonomyrefers to the capacity of an individual to act independently towards the realization of setobjectives such as initiating a new venture and exerting every necessary action to make itsuccessful (Lumpkin & Dess, 2001; Rauch, Wiklund, Lumpkin, & Frese, 2009). Autonomy isoften associated with setting ones’ own goals and evolving ones’ own plan of action towardsachieving set goals (Rauch & Frese, 2007b), characterized by tendency to avoid or even rebelagainst environment that constrains independent actions. It is also sometimes seen as thecapacity to function effectively in an independent environment (Campo, Parra, & Parellada,2012).In franchising, it has been found that since most franchisees join the network as a mean ofrealizing their entrepreneurial ambition (Frazer et al., 2007), mounting too much constraintson the operations of their outlets has the potential to invoke a sense of disappointment inthem(Cochet, Dormann, & Ehrmann, 2008) and consequently, the risks of undesirable behaviours.For example, in a study examining the challenge of autonomy and dependence in franchisedchannels, Dant & Gundlach (1999) conclude that franchisees that are granted autonomy aremore motivated to perform than others who are given none. Similarly, Cochet et al. (2008)’sstudy on capitalizing on franchisees’ autonomy, involving a sample of 208 Germanfranchiseesconcludes that granting franchisees autonomy can enhance chain-wide adaptation andimprovefranchisees’ overall satisfaction. In the same vein, Davies et al (2011)’s study whichculminated into the development of model of trust and compliance in franchising found that a
major cause of conflict and franchisees’ dissatisfaction is lack of autonomy. Franchisees