Plato Thrasymachus Notes

Plato Thrasymachus Notes - I V. THRASYM ACHUS " All this...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
IV. THRASYMACHUS "All this time Thrasymachus had been trying more than once to break in upon our conversation. ... Polemarchus and I were frightened out of our wits, when he burst out to the whole company: What is the matter with you two Socrates? Why do you go on in this imbecile way, politely deferring to each other's nonsense?" (336b) Thrasymachus can contain himself no longer. Too much sweetness and light. “Socrates,” Thrasymachus says, “should stop playing games and tell us what he thinks justice is. Everyone knows it is easier to ask questions than to answer them. And if he refuses, then he should listen to me.” (mock quotation) Thrasymachus believed who what justice is, and was eager to instruct. 1 . Introduction to Book I ‘part two’ (336ff) The first book of the Republic was initially a free-standing dialogue. If it had come down to us in that form, then if not known to us by the name of its subject, justice, it would be known to us by the name of Socrates's principal protagonist in this book, Thrasymachus. As said in Section 3.5 of the previous chapter: “Before [the ] was revised into its current shape, there was a freestanding version of the first book, On Justice or Thrasymachus ” (Nails 2002, p. 324), as well as “a proto- Ideal State of two scrolls” ( ibid .) that “comprised most of [what is for us] 2-5" (p. 325). After Socrates he is the dominant presence. The book runs to twenty seven Stephanus- pages (327-354c): five are occupied with stage-setting and preliminary conversation with Cephalus in which the difficulty of giving examples of right and wrong kinds of action is registered; five are taken up by Socrates and Polemarchus in cooperative inquiry, and, in the end, agreement on the point that it is always wrong to harm anyone, friend or foe. The remaining seventeen pages are occupied with Socrates's elenchus of Thrasymachus’s view concerning the nature. and the value, of justice. There is no cooperation here, no meeting of minds. It is a confrontation in which Thrasymachus is seriously shamed and embarrassed, and in the end silenced, though not persuaded that he was quite wrong in what he wanted to say about justice and its value, or of the truth of alternative views of justice and its value to those expressed by Socrates. Nor is Socrates satisfied with the terms of Thrasymachus's defeat. He confesses that his arguments against Thrasymachus's views regarding the nature of justice, and his own positive arguments for the nature of justice, and for the value to an individual of a just character, are at many points at best incomplete. He was right. Certainly there
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
The soul is like a society? Compare . The guru, “Life isn’t like a fountain?!” And, “Life is a fountain,” Audarya 1 Fellowship ,
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/13/2010 for the course PHIL 152 taught by Professor Hoyt during the Fall '08 term at Loyola New Orleans.

Page1 / 32

Plato Thrasymachus Notes - I V. THRASYM ACHUS " All this...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online