Econ 160 Study Guide

Econ 160 Study Guide - Lecture 6 Controlling Violence 2...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
2 critical factors for homicide: 1. Weapon choice 2. Decision to use the weapon As a third factor, we can limit the weapon range of choice. As is the case with speeding and drunken driving, 1. society has a range of options to influence individuals not to put others at risk and 2. a balance of measure can reduce risk. As a society, we must choose. Casual drinkers will respond to deterrence measure, but alcoholic drivers will not, thus the only effective solution for them is removal of the instrument or effective incapacitation (treatment) Solid evidence that family violence is deterred by police intervention leading to arrest of the perpetrator Most individuals would be unable to complete a homicide without some weapon other than their own hands Our nation continues to have the highest murder rates among advanced nations because we have such easy access to guns. 3 possible points of intervention. At the point of threat (by threat of sanctions or intervening officer) at the point of weapon choice (by constraining weapon availability) and at the point of choosing to use the weapon. Total homicides fall simply by reducing the number of guns among the general public, even though the use of guns by criminals remains unchanged. This is Kellerman's main point. Firearms are used 65% of the time in homicides NRA vs. Handgun Control: NRA views the ownership and possession of guns as a right that should not be constrained in any way, as it is guaranteed by the US constitution. NRA views any degree of weapons control as a violation of the constitution. The Position of Warren Burger: chief Justice, U Supreme Court, believes that guns should be registered as with autos and that there should be a listing age, a waiting period, transfers registered as with vehicles, and ballistic fingerprints on file. Kellerman's Research Results: Argued successfully against the self defense argument and rebuttal, Kellerman based his conclusion on epidemiological studies. Firearms in the home as a risk to family, suicide and homicide. Guns do not provide substantial protection against homicide (homes with guns have a 3X higher chance of homicide and a 5X higher chance of suicide). Guns are used way more for criminal violence than for self defense, and our homicide rates are 10X those of western Europe. Pogo's Observation: We have met the enemy, and he is US. Lecture 6 – Crime in CA UCR Offenses Per Capita by State Crime Generation: OF=f(CR,SV,SE,MC) OFPC=(PRPC,SC,MC), meaning that offenses per capita varies with prisoners per capita, casual variables, and moral compliance SE: Casual variable = Human capital: % of students above basic grade 4 reading, deaths per 100,00 from heart disease, % of children below poverty MC: Moral compliance = % catholic, % weekly church attendance Education, MC, and Less poverty reduce crime, health is insignificant. The Meth Epidemic
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 8

Econ 160 Study Guide - Lecture 6 Controlling Violence 2...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online