This preview shows pages 1–5. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Chapter 6 Stokes Flows One of the earlier approximations to the NavierStokes equations goes back to Stokes himself, who studied the limit of very small Reynolds number. This has applications to very viscous flows, suspensions and bubbles, and the recently important field of microfluiddynamics. Highlights include Stokes’ paradox, farfield effects, kinematic reversibility, and the role of vorticity. (Fig. 6.1). 6.1 Stokes’ equation We start from the NavierStokes equations, and use a velocity U and length L as scaling quantities. Notations: u i = U u * i x j = L x * j Then ∂ t u i + u j ∂ j u i = 1 ρ ∂ i p + ν∂ 2 jj u i (6.1) becomes U∂ t u * i + U 2 /Lu * j ∂ * j u * i = 1 ρL ∂ * i p + νU/L 2 ∂ * 2 jj u * i (6.2) Since we expect the viscous term to be significant, we set its coefficient equal to 1 by multiplication by L 2 /Uν , yielding L 2 ν ∂ t u * i + Re L u * j ∂ * j u * i = L ρUν ∂ * i p + ∂ * 2 jj u * i (6.3) 145 146 CHAPTER 6. STOKES FLOWS G.I. Taylor’s movie: Creeping flows • Vanishing Reynolds number (large viscosity or small scale or low velocity) or convective terms vanish because of geometry (e.g. Poiseuille/Couette flow at moderate Re). • Kinematic reversibility (but stresses change sign). • No inertia, no convective terms. • Balls, drops and suspensions. – Long range effects: ∇ 2 everywhere. – Vorticity essential (from B.C.). – Flow around a sphere: exact solution – Stokes’ paradox: flow around a cylinder – Stokes drag – Slender bodies • Lubrication • Propulsion • HeleShaw cell Figure 6.1: A wonderful movie by G.I. Taylor: low Re flows 6.1. STOKES’ EQUATION 147 Figure 6.2: Mindmap relative to scaling of pressure In the limit of very small Re L , the nonlinear terms drop out. Mathemati cally, this makes the equations linear in u i , hence more easily solvable. Also, the viscous time scale is L 2 ν . Flow disturbances associated with times larger than this are in effect quasistationary, and the field is in equilibrium with the current conditions imposed at the boundary (examples in the movie). Furthermore, we see that ρU 2 is no longer the correct scaling for pressure. In this instance, the pressure field scales as μU/L , which may be representative of the shear stress applied at a boundary. See Fig. 6.2 The resulting equation is very simple: ∂ i p = μ∂ 2 jj u i (6.4) or ∇ p = μ ∇ 2 u (6.5) or again (using incompressibility, so that ∇ × ω =∇ 2 u ) ∇ p = μ ∇ × ω (6.6) This should be contrasted to Crocco’s result for inviscid flow. Since we assume incompressibility ( ∇ · u = 0), it follows that ∇ 2 p = 0 . (6.7) 148 CHAPTER 6. STOKES FLOWS Figure 6.3: Mindmap: Pressure and vorticity in Stokes flow: Laplace equa tion and farfield effects Similarly, since ∇ × ∇ p = 0 for any smooth scalar function, we also have ∇ 2 ω = 0 . (6.8) Laplace equation everywhere! Note that in the case of (vector) vorticity, it applies to each component. For vorticity, the stretching and advection termsapplies to each component....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 10/16/2010 for the course L.C.SMITH MAE643 taught by Professor Xx during the Spring '10 term at Syracuse.
 Spring '10
 XX

Click to edit the document details