The rise of secularism the alternative to having a

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: state system • Liberal nationalism has its roots in the Treaty of Westphalia, which was signed in 1648. • The rise of secularism • The alternative to having a state system was not, as Europeans had learned, the kingdom of God on earth: rather, it was vicious religious warfare. • Next several hundred years: – State was defined by practice, not law – Maintained relations via diplomatic service – Constabulary to maintain internal order – Courts to adjudicate disputes and punish – Adopted rules of war and adhered to them • By mid-19th Century – Some freedom of religion – Slavery mostly eradicated 7 8 United States oldest of “modern” nations The French Revolution • The modern international system came into being when the concepts of nationalism and popular, democratic government were added to the Westphalian order. • The first nation to base itself explicitly on these concepts was the United States. • The French Revolution of 1789, and the reactions of the peoples of Europe against Napoleon, brought nationalism and the will of the people to the state system in Europe. • By the mid-nineteenth century, the only fully legitimate states were those that allowed their people some share in their own government. – Far from being a young nation, the United States is actually an old nation, the oldest modern nation in the world. – Autocracies like Tsarist Russia survived – Slavery in the United States existed – Russia and U.S. were recognized by the rest of the system as retrograde exceptions to the rules that governed the modern world. 9 10 Nationalism Vital for States Nationalism Liberalizing • Nationalism was vital to the forging of states that could carry on their business without being destroyed by internal conflict. • Nationalism did what it had to do: • Made popular government safe by creating common loyalties. – It made citizens out of subjects. – It took people who were ruled, and made them into people who could rule. – People could be and were divided by religion, class, or region, but … – With loyalty to the nation at the center of the political system, every party was forced to identify, in some measure with common good measure, with a common good. • Nationalism was not perfect, but it was a practical necessity: – The international system could not exist without wellordered states, and – In an era of popular governments, nationalism was how domestic order was maintained. 11 © 2010, Ted R. Bromund and Minh A. Luong, All Rights Reserved 12 2 Prof. Minh A. Luong <[email protected]> The International State System INTL1280/POLS 1410: Global Security After the Cold War Brown University States needed to act like states Challenge of World War I • Throughout the 19th Century, statehood was real, not honorary. • You became a state not by calling yourself one, but by acting like one. • The First World War did not destroy liberal nationalism • Actually, it reinforced the support for liberal nationalism • Nationalism had not been appl...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 10/17/2010 for the course INTL 0990 taught by Professor Li during the Spring '10 term at Brown.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online