{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

slides7

# slides7 - Lecture Stat 302 Introduction to Probability...

This preview shows pages 1–6. Sign up to view the full content.

Lecture Stat 302 Introduction to Probability - Slides 7 AD Feb. 2010 AD () Feb. 2010 1 / 16

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
Simpson°s Paradox: Sex Bias in Graduate Admissions? Let us examine more carefully the data by examining admissions in some representative departments Depart. Men Women % in % in 1 63 68 2 33 35 3 6 7 Whatever the department to which they apply, women have an higher probability of getting in than men; i.e. we have for any event C i = f apply to department i g P ( A j B \ C i ) ± P ( A j B c \ C i ) and still overall P ( A j B ) ° P ( A j B c ) AD () Feb. 2010 3 / 16

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
Simpson°s Paradox: Sex Bias in Graduate Admissions? Let us examine even more carefully the data Depart. Men Women Appli. % in Appli. % in 1 560 63 25 68 2 417 33 375 35 3 272 6 341 7 AD () Feb. 2010 4 / 16
Simpson°s Paradox: Sex Bias in Graduate Admissions? The mathematical reason is that P ( A j B \ C i ) ± P ( A j B c \ C i ) does NOT indeed imply P ( A j B ) ± P ( A j B c ) as P ( A j B ) = n i = 1 P ( A j B \ C i ) P ( C i j B ) , P ( A j B c ) = n i = 1 P ( A j B c \ C i ) P ( C i j B c ) , It highly depends on the proba of applying to department i given you are a woman/man . The reason is that women tended to apply to competitive departments with low rates of admission, whereas men tended to apply to less-competitive departments with high rates of admission.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}