101 - Practice Problem 1-1 – Answer Which is higher in...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Practice Problem 1-1 – Answer Which is higher in energy? (a) Infrared radiation of 1715 cm–1 or of 2800 cm–1? (b) Radio-frequency radiation of 300 MHz or 60 MHz? (c) Infrared radiation with = 1.0 x 10–6 m or an X ray with = 3.0 x 10–9 m? Remember that energy is directly proportional to frequency (), and inversely proportional to wavelength (). A larger frequency therefore corresponds to HIGHER energy, while a larger wavelength corresponds to a SMALLER energy. (d) Radiation with = 4.0 x 109 Hz or radiation with = 9.0 x 10–6 m? Use the expression c = to convert the given to its corresponding frequency: Practice Problem 1-2 – Answer Because IR absorptions can be expressed either in micrometers or in wavenumbers, it is useful to be able to interconvert between units. Do the following conversions: (a) 3.10 m to cm–1 Recall that , 1 m = 1 x 10–6 m, and 1 cm = 1 x 10–2 m. Each wavelength must therefore be converted from mm to cm before taking its inverse to determine the frequency expressed in wavenumbers (cm –1). (b) 5.85 m to cm–1 Follow the same procedure used in part (a): (c) 2250 cm–1 to m Taking the inverse of the frequency expressed in cm–1 will give the wavelength in cm. Use the metric conversion factors given above to convert from cm to m: (d) 1720 cm–1 to m Follow the same procedure used in part (c): ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 10/25/2010 for the course CH 310n taught by Professor Iverson during the Summer '08 term at University of Texas.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online