151 Reading Discussion Week 2

151 Reading Discussion Week 2 - Still, despite the...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Noah Greenberg Kamali January 13, 2009 Lawso 151 This week’s readings in Professor Hajjar’s book Courting Conflict raised extremely interesting issues of the legality and morality of Israeli Military Courts. One aspect of the reading I found most interesting was the immense differences between Israeli courts and US courts, despite the fact that both are housed in “democratic” nations. Israel’s use of “secret evidence” provided by anonymous sources to convict criminals is a blatant violation of due process, in not permitting the accused to know their accuser.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Still, despite the controversial allegations brought against the military courts, one must keep in mind the atrocities that the courts are attempting to prevent, which is what makes the issue so heated. While Israel has clearly violated the Geneva Conventions in the past few decades, one is hesitant to condemn the tortuous acts when considering the thousands of lives saved by thwarting potential terrorist attacks. Q: Have any foreign nations attempted to indict any Israelis for their tortuous practices?...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/02/2010 for the course LAWSO 151 taught by Professor Hajjar during the Winter '08 term at UCSB.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online