Final paper

Final paper - Kristin Stegall Eng 101-121 K. Wine Feb 4,...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Kristin Stegall Eng 101-121 K. Wine Feb 4, 2008 A Rhetorical Analysis of a Scientific Report When a person analyzes a scientific report, they can inquire and learn about the format of the report. The rhetorical purpose of this paper is to analyze a scientific report. This paper will analyze the global features of the report which are the purpose, the audience, and the form of the report. This paper will also analyze the local features of the report which are the individual pieces of the report. The surface features will also be analyzed in this paper which is the prose of the report, such as voice, style, and word choice (Kirscht and Schlenz, 2002, p. 31). The scientific report for this analysis is “Rescuing valuable genomes by animal cloning: A case for natural disease resistance in cattle”. This article, written by M. E. Westhusin, T. Shin, J. W. Templeton, R. C. Burghardt, and L. G. Adams, was published by the American Society of Animal Science in 2007. The rhetorical purpose of these authors is to inform the scientific community of new findings in their field of study. The report explains the process of cloning a bull to retain important genomes, specifically a genome that causes natural disease resistance to Brucella abortus (Westhusin, Shin, Templeton, Burghardt, & Adams, 2007). This report follows the IMRAD format with the exception of the analysis section which is included within the discussion section because the analysis and discussion are similar for this report. The report is in the IMRAD format (like many scientific reports) so that researchers can look up the information they need easily. This report is directed toward the scientific community so that scientists and researchers can use this new information in their own research and experiments.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
The report begins with an overview of the entire report which is called the abstract and this section summarizes the whole report within one paragraph. According to Kirscht and Schlenz (2002), the abstract is supposed to include the type of study, the object of study, the issues, the method, and the results. The abstract section in this report answers all of the following questions. It clearly states the object of study. “Here we report an example involving cattle and the rescue of a genome affording natural disease resistance” (Westhusin et al., 2007). The methods of the experiment are clear. There were fibroblast cell lines that were stored in liquid nitrogen that the researchers decided to use for somatic cell nuclear transfer to try to clone a bull with a valuable genotype (Westhusin et al., 2007). The results that came from the study were that “one calf survived to term” and it is now four and half years old (Westhusin et al., 2007). This
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This essay was uploaded on 04/03/2008 for the course ENG 101 taught by Professor Cornett during the Spring '08 term at N.C. State.

Page1 / 7

Final paper - Kristin Stegall Eng 101-121 K. Wine Feb 4,...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online