EP The Scope of Logic - Wesley C. Salmon

EP The Scope of Logic - Wesley C. Salmon - Wesley C....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Wesley C. Salmon, Logic (1984). THE SCOPE OF LOGIC 1 When people make statements, they may offer evidence to support them or they may not. A statement that is supported by evidence is the conclusion of an argument, and logic provides tools for the analysis of arguments. Logical analysis is concerned with the relationship between a conclusion and the evidence given to support it. When people reason, they make inferences. These inferences can be transformed into arguments, and the tools of logic can then be applied to the resulting arguments. In this way, the inferences from which they originate can be evaluated. Logic deals with arguments and inferences. One of its main purposes is to provide methods for distinguishing those which are logically correct from those which are not. 1. ARGUMENT In one of his celebrated adventures, Sherlock Holmes comes into possession of an old felt hat. Although Holmes is not acquainted with the owner of the hat, he tells Dr. Watson many things about the man -- among them, that he is highly intellectual. This assertion, as it stands, is unsupported. Holmes may have evidence for his statement, but so far he has not given it. Dr. Watson, as usual, fails to see any basis for Holmes's statement, so he asks for substantiation. "For answer Holmes clapped the hat upon his head. It came right over the forehead and settled upon the bridge of his nose. 'It is a question of cubic capacity,' said he; 'a man with so large a brain must have something in it.' " 1 Now, the statement that the owner of the hat is highly intellectual is no longer an unsupported assertion. Holmes has given the evidence, so his statement is supported. It is the conclusion of an argument. We shall regard assertions as unsupported unless evidence is actually given to support them, whether or not anyone has evidence for them. There is a straightforward reason for making the distinction in this way. Logic is concerned with arguments. An argument consists of more than just a statement; it consists of a conclusion along with supporting evidence. Until the evidence is given, we do not have an argument to examine. It does not matter who gives the evidence. If Watson had cited the size of the hat as evidence for Holmes's conclusion, we would have had an argument to examine. If we, as readers of the story, had been able to cite this evidence, again, there would have been an argument to examine. But by itself, the statement that the owner is highly intellectual is an unsupported assertion. We cannot evaluate an argument unless the evidence, which is an indispensable part of the argument, is given. To distinguish assertions for which no evidence is given from conclusions of arguments is not to condemn them. The purpose is only to make clear the circumstances in which logic is applicable and those in which it is not. If a
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 12

EP The Scope of Logic - Wesley C. Salmon - Wesley C....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online