Lecture+6+-+STV%2C+SNTV%2C+_+start+of+MMS+10.19.10

Lecture+6+-+STV%2C+SNTV%2C+_+start+of+MMS+10.19.10 - SNTV...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–8. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1 SNTV Single nontransferable vote in multi-member districts (SNTV/MMD Where used? ) ex Japan Why “MMD” part important? If it was just sntv without mmd. . Would be same thing as plurality in a single member district How’s it work? “Single” Each voter casts one ballot for a candidate “nontransferable” Each vote stays with that candidate Different from STV “MMD”
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
2 More SNTV/MMD Is this PR? No it is not because - -not intended but can be . . Not mechanism where votes and seats are intended to match
Background image of page 2
3 An Example District 1 (M = 4) Candidate A (JSP): 80,000 votes Candidate B (LDP): 19,999 Candidate C (LDP): 19,000 Candidate D (LDP): 18,500 Candidate E (JSP): 18,000 How many seats does each party win? Who wins those seats? A-D get seats- top get seats up to # of seats availble
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
4 What Guarantees a Seat? Vote % needed to guarantee seat = (100/(M+1)) + 1 vote what gurantees one a seat- most def get a seat- can get one w/o though What is this equation? Droop quota This merely helps predict what you need It’s not a requirement in Japan United States Congress example: (100/[1+1]) + 1 vote = 50% + 1 vote
Background image of page 4
5 Examples M=3 25% (+ 1 vote) m+1==== 3+1/ 100 M=4 20% (+ 1 vote) M=5 16.7% (+ 1 vote) As district magnitude goes up. . Can get a seat with a small share of the vote
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
6 But can win with many fewer as well! District 1 (M = 5)- can win a seat with 10%- can help individuals w/o a lot of votes geat seat Candidate A (JSP): 20,000 votes (20.9%) Candidate B (LDP): 19,999 (20.9%) Candidate C (LDP): 19,000 (19.9%) Candidate D (LDP): 18,500 (19.4%) Candidate E (JSP): 10,000 (10.5%) Candidate F (LDP): 8,000 (8.4%)
Background image of page 6
7 Effects of SNTV/MMD Party Fragmentation Why? Small share of the vote and still get a seat, say you are a small party contesting a election. . 5 seat district, can run and still get a seat– others have to make an alliance– get parties converging together and creating a new party Intraparty competition Why ? 130 districts m=500, say big party and want to get majority of seats, have to win a least two seats per district. Need 251 to get majority. Have to run more than 2 in every distict– end up competing with one another . Competition is witin parties Factions- biggest party in japan. . Broken up– factions that divide up the party Emphasis on candidate rather than party Why?
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 8
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/01/2010 for the course POL pol140a taught by Professor Scheiner during the Fall '10 term at UC Davis.

Page1 / 28

Lecture+6+-+STV%2C+SNTV%2C+_+start+of+MMS+10.19.10 - SNTV...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 8. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online