{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

dis 4 - I t is an extreme step for government regulation I...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
It is an extreme step for government regulation I know, but it may be the only effective way. If animals are regulated such as deer, why should we be above that? When deer destroy vegetation and overpopulate, we feel it is our duty to intervene. We are destroying the world faster than any deer or other organism ever could. Isn’t it then our duty to take extreme steps as well? I think it’s ridiculous to have this naïve assumption that everything will work itself out. We are destroying not only our futures, but our children’s and future families. They may face starvation or nature disasters or numerous amounts of things and it is our fault. I don’t want to be responsible for ultimately the destruction of the world. Giving the
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}