This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: January 30, 2009 Philosophy 4: Eleventh Lecture An Argument that Abortion is Wrong (Continued) • More about the goods:- Marquis th en a sks, “what m akes th e goods of m y future good for m e?” o Why do es h e raise this qu estion? o Consider th e following ex a m ple: a hippy in th e 60s is drafted into th e Army Completed projects of which we are proud The pursuit of our go als Aesthetic e njoym ents Friendships Intellectual pursuits Physical pleasures of various sorts- Here’s th e point: losing th e goods on Marquis’ list do esn’t e nt ail th at this loss is a loss for th e p erson whos e life it is; it do esn’t e nt ail, in oth er words, th at th e loss will (or would) b e exp erienced a s a b ad thing by th e victim- We n e e d to conn ect th e ide a that th e loss of a future of value is a loss for th e p erson who’s life it is • Answers:- One way to g et from th e loss of goods on th e list to a loss for a p erson whose life it is is to claim th at a p erson m ust currently d esire that thos e goods b e p art of his/her future life o The desire account: what makes the good of my future good for me is that I currently desire that these goods be part of my future • But Marquis rejects the desire account:- It doesn’t account for ch ang es in what on e will value at different stag es in on e’s life- It also would m ake it okay to kill a p erson who is t e m porarily suicidal b ec aus e th at p erson would not d esire to continue his/her life, so would not...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 11/07/2010 for the course PHIL PHIL 4 taught by Professor Huizenga during the Winter '09 term at UCSB.
- Winter '09