Twenty-first Lecture

Twenty-first Lecture - March 9, 2009 Philosophy 4:...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: March 9, 2009 Philosophy 4: Twenty-first Lecture Deontology Kant (1724-1804) • The Central Question: - Wh a t is t h e m o r ally c orr e c t t hin g t o d o? (w h a t’s t h e m o r ally rig h t a c tio n ?) o Accordin g t o t utilitarian, it’s whatever produces the best state of he affairs – which for Mill turned out to be pleasure o Bur for Kant, this cannot be correct • Non-Consequentialism: - Utilit ari a nis m is a c o n s e q u e n ti alis t m o r al t h e o ry - Kant d e ni e s t h a t t h e c o n s e q u e n c e s of a n a c tio n a r e w h a t m a k e it rig h t or w ro n g o Kant is a n o n-c o n s e q u e n ti alis t • Deontology: - Kant is a d e o n t olo gis t ( a v a ri e ty of n o n-c o n s e q u e n ti alis t) - A d e o n t olo gis t b eli ev e s t h a t c e r t ain a c tio n s a r e inh er e n tly rig h t, s o m e a r e n eit h e r rig h t n or wro n g, a n d o t h e r s a r e inh er e n tly wro n g o Ass u m e t h a t all a c tio n s c a n b e p u t int o t hr e e c a t e g o ri e s: t h o s e t h a t a r e m o r ally r e q uir e d t o d o, n o t m o r ally r e q uir e d t o d o or n o t t o d o, or m o r ally r e q uir e d n o t t o d o Wh a t d e t e r mi n e s w hic h gr o u p e a c h a c tio n g e t s p u t int o is s o m e p ro p e r ty of t h e a c tio n its elf • Kant’s Method: - Kant a p pr o a c h e s e t hic s t hro u g h a p p e als t o t h e or din a ry u n d e r s t a n din g of w h a t m a k e s a n a c tio n m o r ally c orr e c t - H e b ei n g s t h e gr o u n d w ork b y a s kin g t hr e e q u e s tio n s: o Wh a t m a k e s a p e r s o n m o r ally g o o d ? We a c t for a g o al Mor al a s s e s s m e n t, h o w e v e r, d o e s n o t d e p e n d o n a c hi e vin g t h a t g o al So, m o r al a s s e s s m e n t d e p e n d intentione not on the s on th , consequences o What kind of intention makes one morally good? Two kinds of motives: • A desire for happiness • Duty Ordinary people distinguish between being good and being happy So duty is the correct intention o What does it mean to act from duty? It is to resolve to do the law out of respect for that law • We resolve to do something when we are willing to frustrate our desires against it • The Right Action: - Kant c alls a c tio n s d o n e o u t of r e s p e c t for t h e law (d o n e fro m t h e int e n tio n o f a d u t y) t h e “ g o o d will: - Th e g o o d will p e rfor m s a c tio n s b e c a u s e it r e c o g niz e s a d u t y ( d e o n t olo g y) t o d o t h e rig h t t hin g • The Shopkeepers: - Let’s a s s u m e t h a t t h er e is a s h o pk e e p e r w h o ow n s a c a n d y s t o r y, a n d in w alks a b o y n a m e d Ch a rlie w h o w a n t s a Wonk a b a r o S h o pk e e p e r 1 d o e s t h e wro n g t hin g: h e s ells Ch arlie t h e Wonk a b a r for m or e t h a n it’s r e ally w or t h o S h o pk e e p e r 2 (politici a n s h o pk e e p e r) k n ow s t h a t h e c o uld c h e a t C h arlie a n d c h ar g e hi m t h e wro n g pric e a n d g e t a w a y wit h it, b u t h e d o e s n’t b e c a u s e h e d o e s n’t w a n t it t o g e t a r o u n d t h a t h e d o e s t h e w ro n g t hin g (h e d o e s t h e rig h t t hin g, b u t t h e int e n tio n is t o pr e s e r v e a n h o n e s t r e p u t a tio n for hi m s elf) o S h o pk e e p e r 3 (Mich a el Jacks o n s h o pk e e p e r) kn ow s t h a t h e c o uld s ell C h arlie t h e c h o c ol a t e b a r a t t h e wro n g p ric e, b u t h e d o e s n’t b e c a u s e h e l ov e s c hildr e n s o m u c h t h a t h e c a n’t im a gin e c h e a tin g Ch arlie (t ak e s p l e a s ur e in b ein g nic e) o S h o pk e e p e r 4 (Scroo g e s h o pk e e p e r) h a t e s p e o pl e, d o e s n’t lik e c hildr e n, a n d c a n’t s t a n d Ch a rlie, b u t h e s ells Ch arlie t h e c h o c ol a t e b a r a t t h e rig h t p ric e b e c a u s e h e k n ow s t h a t it’s t h e rig h t t hin g t o d o ( mis a n t hro p e w h o d o e s t h e rig h t t hin g o nly b e c a u s e it is t h e rig h t t hin g t o d o) Actin g in a c c or d a n c e wit h d u t y (S 2 a n d S 3) Actin g fro m d u t y (S 4) • So t h e m o r ally c orr e c t a c tio n will b e d o n e for t h e rig h t r e a s o n s , o u t of r e s p e c t for t h e m o r al law. But t h a t’s n o t t h e e n d of t h e s t ory: w e n e e d t o s a y m o r e a b o u t w h a t t h e n a t ur e of t h e m o r al l aw is ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/07/2010 for the course PHIL PHIL 4 taught by Professor Huizenga during the Winter '09 term at UCSB.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online