This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: HW 3 Solutions Math 115, Winter 2009, Prof. Yitzhak Katznelson 7.4 a) Let x n = √ 2 n . Then lim x n = 0 (as you may easily check  for ǫ > 0, just let N be ǫ √ 2 ), which is rational, even though all the x n are irrational. b) Consider the number √ 2 and its decimal expansion 1.41421..., and th3n let x 1 = 1 . 4, x 2 = 1 . 41, x 3 = 1 . 414, et cetera. The error  x n √ 2  is less than 10 n at every step, and so if ǫ > 0, pick N = log 10 ǫ ; then if n > N ,  x n √ 2  < 10 log 10 ǫ = ǫ . Thus the x n converge to the irrational number √ 2 even though the x n themselves are all rational. 7.5 a) Find lim s n where s n = √ n 2 + 1 n (no formal proof). To do this, unrationalize the denominator by multiplying by √ n 2 +1+ n √ n 2 +1+ n ; we see that s n = n 2 +1 n 2 √ n 2 +1+ n = 1 √ n 2 +1+ n . Now the denominator is greater than √ n 2 + n = 2 n , so we know that 0 < s n < 1 2 n . But lim 1 / 2 n = 0, and lim 0 = 0, so this means that lim s n = 0. b) Find lim s n where s n = √ n 2 + n n (no formal proof). As with a), unrationalize the denominator by multiplying and divid ing by the conjugate √ n 2 + n + n . We see that s n = n √ n 2 + n + n . Divide both the numerator and denominator by n to get that s n = 1 √ 1+ 1 n +1 . Now as n goes to infinity, 1 /n goes to zero, so the denominator gets closer and closer to √ 1 + 1 = 2, so then lim s n itself is 1 2 . c) Find lim s n where s n = √ 4 n 2 + n 2 n (no formal proof). First unrationalize the denominator, and then as in part b), divide both the numerator and the denominator by n . You should get that s n = 1 √ 4+ 1 n +2 . As n gets bigger, the denominator goes to √ 4 + 2 = 4, so we see that lim s n = 1 4 .. 8.3. Let s n be a sequence of nonnegative real numbers, and suppose that lim s n = 0. Prove that lim √ s n = 0. To do this, verify the definition of the limit. Pick ǫ > 0. Then ǫ 2 > 0; since lim s n = 0, we may find N such that n > N implies that  s n  < ǫ 2 . s n is positive, so s n =  s n  < ǫ 2 . Take the square root of both sides to find that √ s n < ǫ , and thus  √ s n  < ǫ . So we have found N such that if n > N , then  √ s n  < ǫ ; therefore lim √ s n = 0. squaresolid 1 2 8.4. Let ( t n ) be a bounded sequence; i.e. there exists M such that  t n  ≤ M for all n , and let ( s n ) be a sequence with lim s n = 0. Prove that lim( s n t n ) = 0....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 11/03/2010 for the course MATH 131A 26244722 taught by Professor Kozhan,r during the Fall '10 term at UCLA.
 Fall '10
 KOZHAN,R

Click to edit the document details