JenniferJohnson296-CM105-02-Unit 8 -Peer Review of Jennifer Merino

JenniferJohnson296-CM105-02-Unit 8 -Peer Review of Jennifer Merino

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Peer Review of Jennifer Merino Running Head: PEER REVIEW OF JENNIFER MERINO Unit 8 Peer Review Exercise Jennifer Johnson Kaplan University CM105-02 Professor Krishnan June 16, 2010
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Peer Review of Jennifer Merino 1. Were all parts of the subject covered in the presentation, or were any left out? Explain: This presentation covered all parts of the subject. The notes and the presentation provided information on the topic. While viewing the presentation without the note you are able to understand what the presenter wants to convey. In addition, the notes add value by giving information on how this topic is affecting all ages. 2. Were appropriate headings used for each of the main points of the presentation? Headings used on each of the pages for the presentation that supported the main points of the presentation. 3. Were the main points supported by notes in the notes section of each slide? The presentation included notes on each slide that supported the main points. Notes
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 3

JenniferJohnson296-CM105-02-Unit 8 -Peer Review of Jennifer Merino

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online