CONTRACTS2.doc

CONTRACTS2.doc - 4. Use whichever meaning of the word the...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CONTRACTS cont’d Plain Meaning Rule –  if the words are clear and unambiguous, the court decides what the  agreement was from the document only if the words are not clear and unambiguous, the court can look at  other information to figure out what the agreement was Rules of Interpretation 1. Interpret using reasonable person standard. 2. Look at the whole K. 3. Terms specially negotiated beat standard terms.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 4. Use whichever meaning of the word the parties intended – plain meaning or technical. 5. Specific wording beats general wording. 6. Written-in terms beat typewritten ones. 7. The K is construed against the drafter. 8. If a word is ambiguous, can use trade usage, prior dealing, or course of performance to decide what the parties meant....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/07/2010 for the course BLAW 3311 taught by Professor Boykin during the Fall '07 term at UT Arlington.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online