This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: atson and Francis Crick did see a report of her unpublished results, and unpublished rushed to publish an a posteriori model of DNA posteriori that synthesized Avery et al.’s genetic data, al.’ Chargaff’s chemical data, Chargaff’ and the physical data obtained by Franklin without any acknowledgement. Books by Watson or Crick Books Genetic Two-ness in the Double Helix TwoThe X-ray diffraction Ximages taken by Franklin were excellent, and, when the DNA was observed in certain conditions of hydration, the images could only be interpreted to result from a structure that has a double helix. double honestjim rememberingfranciscrickacelebration Re-appraisal of Old X-ray Diffraction ReXData
Once you have seen Rosalind Franklin’s Franklin’ X-ray data, it is easy to see the double helix in the X-ray Xdata obtained by Astbury and Bell (1938). Two-ness Makes Sense in Terms of TwoGenetic Replication
The double nature was The double beautiful from a biological and genetic biological and genetic perspective. Watson and Crick Watson (1953) saw this and wrote, “It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we specific have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material. Chemistry of DNA Nitrogen Bases Nitrogen The Double Helix The The Double Helix: Cambridge England Matching Double Helix at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory The Double Helix: Vanderbilt University The Double Helix: Missouri Botanical Garden The Double Helix: Filton...
View Full Document