{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Poverty & Aid 9-29

Poverty & Aid 9-29 - GlobalPoverty&InternationalAid...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–9. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Global Poverty & International Aid 9-27-2010
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The Question:   What obligations do individual citizens of  wealthy nations (for example, you) have  towards people suffering from poverty in  faraway countries?
Background image of page 2
Some numbers: Global Poverty
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Some Numbers: Global Poverty Every year more than  6 million  children under the age of five die  from preventable causes (malaria, diarrhea, pneumonia). More than  50%  of Africans suffer from water-related diseases  (cholera, infant diarrhea). 3 Million  people per year die from malaria. Of the  300 million  children who go to bed hungry each night, more  than  90%  are suffering long-term malnutrition. More than  2.6 billion  do not have basic water sanitation; more than  1 billion  use unsafe drinking water sources. Women in Africa have a  1 in 16  chance of dying in pregnancy or  childbirth. ( 1 in 3,700  in North America).
Background image of page 4
Peter Singer Born 1946 Career at Monash University (1977- 1999) and Princeton University  (1999-Present)  Author of: “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”  (1972)   Animal Liberation  (1975)
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Singer’s Argument: P1: Suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and  medical care are bad. P2: If it is in our power to prevent something bad from  happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of  comparable moral importance , we ought, morally, to do  it. (STRONG version) . . .without thereby sacrificing anything  morally  significant , we ought to do it (WEAK version) P3: Most of us are in a position to prevent suffering and  death (bad things) without sacrificing anything of  (equal?) moral importance (new clothes, nice dinner,  booze, movies).
Background image of page 6
Singer’s Conclusion:   We have a  moral duty  to prevent  suffering and death, even if it  requires sacrificing “luxuries” for  ourselves that we could afford to  enjoy.
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Theoretical Interlude 1 Philosophers divide actions into several categories: Morally  Prohibited Actions that are not prohibited are: Morally  Permitted.  Actions that are permitted are either: Morally  Neutral              Or Morally  Obligatory
Background image of page 8
Image of page 9
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}