lecture14.1.doc - LECTURE NOTES UCLA PS 40 Department of...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
LECTURE NOTES UCLA Department of Political Science Winter 2010 PS 40 Introduction to American Politics Prof. Thomas Schwartz Today we consider the problem of enforcing or implementing policies. Distinct from the problem of making good laws, it concerns how legislation translates into practice. Earlier in the course we mentioned that the federal government (Congress) under the Articles of Confederation had this problem: it could not enforce its will. A telling example of the problem of implementation is George Washington’s suggestion to Congress that cattle and grain be taken from the farmers in Long Island so that the British who had just landed there could not get them. Congress took his advice, but nothing happened: the farmers kept their cattle and grain. A couple of other examples are Lincoln’s ordering General McClellan to attack Richmond, and his ordering General Meade to pursue the enemy after Gettysburg. They failed to carry out Lincoln’s orders. Similar examples involve Soviet leader Gorbachev’s initial efforts to reduce drinking and to reform the economy in the USSR. His orders had scant effect. These examples are instances of the agency problem . How does someone, a principal , get someone else, an agent , to do something? Much of political theory is about how government should be organized to reach good decisions - - and what, for that matter, constitutes a good decision. Much of political science, in contrast, is about what policies are made and how. Our problem today is a third one: the problem of governance , or control - - the problem of how policies are enforced, of how political decisions have effect. 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
sovereign, the strongest person around, cannot coerce everyone in society to obey him; physically it is not feasible. Principal-Agent Problem Principal : This is someone who wishes to delegate power to someone else to do something, to implement some policy . Examples include a king, an employer, Congress. Agent : This is someone who has been hired or charged by the principal to do something. Examples include lesser nobles, employees, the bureaucracy. How, having delegated power, can a principal control his agent to get the job done? It is not feasible to monitor the agent(s) all the time. Look: The agent can either work or shirk , either do the job or not. The principal can either monitor the agent’s behavior or not . For the principal, monitoring is costly . His favorite outcome is for the agent to do the job without being monitored, while his least favored outcome is for the agent to shirk despite being monitored. If the principal knew for sure that the agent would shirk, he had rather not monitor. The agent’s preferences are obvious.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/16/2010 for the course POL SCI pol sci 40 taught by Professor Schwartz during the Spring '09 term at UCLA.

Page1 / 9

lecture14.1.doc - LECTURE NOTES UCLA PS 40 Department of...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online