{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

2005ps - Problem Set 1 Econ 702 Spring 2005 Problem 1 For a...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Problem Set 1 Econ 702, Spring 2005 January 15, 2005 Problem 1 For a representative agent economy prove the following: x * PO ( ε ) x * arg max x X u ( x ) (1) Problem 2 Consider the following social planner’s problem: max { c t ,l t ,n t ,k t +1 } t =0 β t u ( c t ) (2) s.t. c t + k t +1 = f ( k t , n t ) + (1 - δ ) k t k 0 given, c t , k t +1 , n t , t 0 t + n t = 1 Show that the set of feasible allocations is convex and compact. Problem 3 Consider the social planner’s problem (SPP)above with Cobb-Douglas technology, partial depreciation and CRRA preferences. Derive the euler equa- tion. Problem 4 Defining the commodity space as a space of bounded real sequences, L = { { it } t =0 , sup i,t | it | < ∀ } (3) Prove that L endowed with the supnorm is a topological vector space (TVS). Also prove that R n endowed with the usual Euclidian norm is a TVS. Problem 5 Show that the consumption possibility set, X , and the production possibility set, Y are convex and has an interior point (endowed with supnorm). Problem 6 Show that the set of feasible allocations is compact ( X Y ) 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Problem 7 Let ( p * , x * , y * ) be an AD equilibrium. Setup the household and firm problem in AD language and derive the prices from the given equilibrium allocations and FOCs. Show that the following mapping constitutes a SME (by verifying the FOCs of SME problem is satisfied) c * t = x * 1 t - x * 2 t +1 t (4) n * t = x * 3 t , * t = 0 t (5) k * t = x * 2 t t (6) R * t = p * 2 t p * 1 t t (7) w * t = p * 3 t p * 1 t t (8) 2
Background image of page 2
Homework 2 Spring2005, Econ702 Problem 1 Consider the sequence of markets setting in a stochastic economy that we discused in class. Find an arbitrage condition that links the price of state contigent claims, q t +1 ( h t , z t +1 ) and the interest rate R t +1 ( h t +1 ) . Problem 2 On Tuesday’s lecture we wrote down the problem of the representative agent in the sequence of markets setting, and we obtained a (general) formula for the price of the state n contigent claim, q t +1 ( h t , z n ) . Repeat the analysis using particular functional forms for preferences and technology. More precisely, use a constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) utility function and a Cobb-Douglas (CD) production function. Assume full depreciation ( δ = 1 ). Also assume that the productivity shock evolves according to a three state Markov Chain, so that for every t, z t { z 1 , z 2 , z 3 } . Give formulas for the prices of the state contigent claims. Finally, define a Suquence of Markets Equilibrium (SME) for this specific example. Problem 3 Consider a stochastic economy in which the production function f t = f ( k t , 1) is multiplied by a random shock, z t , z t { z 1 , z 2 , ..., z M } Using the same functional forms as in Problem 2 (but now without full depreciation) i) Write down the Social Planner’s problem, ii) Find the Euler Equation, and iii) Characterize the steady state solution as much as you can.
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}