{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

solpr1ec70204

# solpr1ec70204 - Problem Set 1 Econ 702 Spring 2004 Prepared...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

Problem Set 1 Econ 702, Spring 2004 Prepared by Ahu Gemici February 7, 2004 Problem 1 Show that without the assumption of continuity of the price func- tion, the proof of First Basic Welfare Theorem doesn’t go through. Solution: I will write down the proof of FBWT with the assumption that the price function is continous and point out to the places we need this property for the proof to go through. Theorem 1 (First Basic Welfare Theorem) Suppose that for all i , all x X i there exists a sequence { x n } n =0 in X i converging to x with u ( x n ) u ( x ) for all n (local nonsatiation). If an allocation [( x * i ) j J , ( y * i ) i I ] and a conti- nous linear functional ν constitute a competitive equilibrium, then the allocation [( x * i ) j J , ( y * i ) i I ] is Pareto optimal. Proof. As you will remember from your 701, the first thing before we prove FBWT is to show that if x * i solves agent i’s optimization problem, and if there is another allocation that gives him at least as much (or strictly more) utility, then it must be that that allocation is at least as (or strictly more) expensive as x * i . In other words, i , all x i X , u ( x i ) u ( x * i ) ν ( x i ) ν ( x * i ) (1) u ( x i ) > u ( x * i ) ν ( x i ) > ν ( x * i ) (2) First, showing (1): Suppose not, so that, u ( x i ) u ( x * i ) and ν ( x

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 4

solpr1ec70204 - Problem Set 1 Econ 702 Spring 2004 Prepared...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online