APP7WortherleyT

APP7WortherleyT - RUNNING HEAD: RECOGNIZING AND AVOIDING...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
RUNNING HEAD: RECOGNIZING AND AVOIDING PLAGARISIM 1 Tammy Wortherley Recognizing and avoiding plagiarism Professor Graham December 20, 2009
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
RUNNING HEAD: RECOGNIZING AND AVOIDING PLAGARISIM 2 ”Doctors, whose first allegiance is supposed to be to their patients, have traditionally stood between drug company researchers and trusting consumers. Yet unless there is evidence of misconduct (the deliberate misrepresentation of something as fact by someone who knows it is not), it is very difficult to discover and virtually impossible to prove that a piece of biomedical research has been tainted by conflict of interest. No study is perfect, and problems arise in the labs of even the most conscientious and honest researchers. Although biomedical research incorporates rigorous scientific rules and is often critically scrutinized by peers, the information can nevertheless be warped—by ending a study because the results are disappointing; changing rules mid- study; not trying to publish negative results; publicizing preliminary results even with
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/13/2010 for the course IT 6410 taught by Professor Bebble during the Spring '10 term at Walden University.

Page1 / 3

APP7WortherleyT - RUNNING HEAD: RECOGNIZING AND AVOIDING...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online