This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Informed consent – “Paramount importance” (ASA Ethics Code) Minimize harms to participants Includes stress and other psychological harm Strive for benefits to participants and society Strive for justice in benefits of research, attention to under-served and neglected groups Milgram study was not minimal risk. Participants were not given informed consent Deception was not minimal, it was necessary • There was no idea that there would be risks Milgram did debrief the participants, but only after the experiment was over Participants did not think they were free to terminate study Regulation and monitoring was not done through Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Replicating Milgram Today ABC “Primetime” project Modifications to protocol They were given informed consent, but still, about 65% went all the way...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 11/17/2010 for the course SOC 330P taught by Professor Maryrose during the Fall '10 term at University of Texas.
- Fall '10