This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Restrictive Covenant is legal but court cannot enforce the covenant Sweat v. Painter (1950) Black student was denied admission to UT Law school Evolution of the Equal Protection Interpretation Brown v. Board of Education o Suspect classification o Went to school that was whites only in a diverse neighborhood o Denied by school o Separate by Equal is unconstitutional Supreme Court Decision after Brown o De facto vs. de jure (by law) segregation Miliken v. Bradely (1974) Doesnt prohibit the idea that there will be segregation based on individual choice Segregation by law is unconstitutional Affirmative Action o Ca v. Bakke (1978) o Hopwood v. Texas (1996) o Univ of Michigan Aff Action Cases Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) Womens rights o Equal Rights Amendment o Court Rulings on gender Intermediate or heightened scrutiny Craig v. Boren (1976) Arizona Immigration Law...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 11/18/2010 for the course GOV 310L taught by Professor Kieth during the Spring '07 term at University of Texas at Austin.
- Spring '07