sa_ArtGtE-commerce Chapter 3 case 1

sa_ArtGtE-commerce Chapter 3 case 1 - THE ART OF...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1 of 13 THE ART OF GRANTSMANSHIP by Jacob KRAICER Feel free to copy part or all of this document, but with the following provisos: The contents must not be altered in any way No monetary charge is to be requested or received for copies made/distributed The source of the document is to be fully acknowledged For further information contact [email protected] 1. INTRODUCTION "Grantsmanship is the art of acquiring peer-reviewed research funding" The objective of these guidelines is to assist both new and veteran investigators to optimize their chances of successfully competing in a peer-reviewed grant application competition. It is a competition. With success rates falling to 50% or below, the difference between success and failure often results, not just from the quality of the science, but from the quality of the grant application. In all probability, the quality of science of the applications in the 10% below the cut- off for funding by an agency is not significantly different from that in the 10% just above the cut- off. "Grantsmanship" can make the difference. The art of "grantsmanship" will not turn mediocre science into a fundable grant proposal. But poor "grantsmanship" will, and often does, turn very good science into an unfundable grant proposal. Good writing will not save bad ideas, but bad writing can kill good ones. Why am I qualified to give advice? First, I was successful in obtaining peer-reviewed funding and I served on a number of national and international reviewing bodies for some 30 years. But perhaps more relevant is the fact that I was responsible for the administration of a peer- reviewed research grants program for four years. During this time some 1600 research grant applications were processed. My comments, suggestions, and recommendations are based on this experience, plus documents and discussions listed in the acknowledgements. They are relevant to most peer- reviewed research grant applications to most granting agencies. The information required, formats, and review processes are generally similar. 2. BEFORE YOU START TO WRITE Read the Guidebooks, Guidelines, and Application Forms carefully and follow them exactly. Make sure that you have the latest versions. Make sure that your proposal "fits" with the mission of the agency and that your objectives match with those of the agency. Make this "match" explicit in your written application.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
2 of 13 If you have any doubts or questions, contact the relevant granting agency person, who will welcome your questions and answer them. They really do want to help. Find out the median funding level for the agency. This will allow you to formulate a reasonable budget. Find colleagues who have served on, or have received grants from, the agency. They can give you "insider" information on how the agency works, and what "sells". Begin to formulate / clarify your ideas.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/17/2010 for the course ABORKER jong hyuk taught by Professor Mr.steve during the Spring '10 term at UAA.

Page1 / 13

sa_ArtGtE-commerce Chapter 3 case 1 - THE ART OF...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online