chapter 4 - 4 Relevant Disciplines and Disciplinary...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
4 Relevant Disciplines and Disciplinary Perspectives This chapter first identifies the key disciplines (and interdisciplinary fields) that must be engaged in this project. It then summarizes the disciplinary perspective of each. As will be argued below, disciplinary insights can only be understood and evaluated within the context of the ‘disciplinary perspective’ from which they emerge. The interdisciplinarian must strive to convince their audience that they understand both the insights and the relevant perspectives (Repko 2008). This chapter naturally draws upon chapters 2 and 3 since disciplinary perspective is grounded in and largely comprises the mutually compatible set of phenomena, theories, and methods that is chosen by the discipline. But disciplinary perspective is more than this, and attention must thus also be paid to ideological, ethical, and epistemological dimensions. In turn chapter 4 sets the stage for the evaluation of disciplinary insights in later chapters. 4.1 Which Disciplines Should be Engaged? Which disciplines need to be engaged in this study? The previous chapters have indicated that the causes of economic growth likely include institutional, tech- nological, cultural, social, and geographical elements. We can thus imagine that the various social science disciplines – economics, sociology, anthropology, political science, and geography – will need to be included in our purview. We must familiarize ourselves with the perspectives of each of these disciplines. We will also want to identify insights relevant to economic growth from each. We will not need to survey any of these disciplines in its entirety in this respect, but only those subfields of particular interest: the sociology of knowledge but not (for the most part) the sociology of religion. In doing so, we should, as ever, be careful of not being seduced by existing scholarship: we should ask ourselves not only what insights sociologists have generated but also what insights might have been generated by their unique perspective if they had paid more attention to growth. Technology is studied not only in various disciplines but in the major interdis- ciplinary field of ‘science and technology studies:’ since technology and science is the only major category of phenomena discussed in chapter 2 that is not the primary focus of a discipline, this field might be thought to represent a missing discipline. Culture too is the focus of an interdisciplinary endeavor(s) termed ‘cultural studies.’ Marxian analysis also crosses disciplinary boundaries. Linguis- tics is not likely to play a central role in our discussions, though one can imagine that there are some economic advantages to a society in speaking one of the world’s major trading languages (but perhaps disadvantages as well). Psychology may usefully guide us to understand why humans behave as they do in various R. Szostak, The Causes of Economic Growth , DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-92282-7_4, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009 99
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
4. Relevant Disciplines and Disciplinary Perspectives
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 36

chapter 4 - 4 Relevant Disciplines and Disciplinary...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online