{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

57326-0136147054_13

# 57326-0136147054_13 - Section 13.1 13.1.1 Part(a f(1 2 1...

This preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

Section 13.1 13.1.1: Part (a): f (1 , 2) · 1 + f (2 , 2) · 1 + f (1 , 1) · 1 + f (2 , 1) · 1 + f (1 , 0) · 1 + f (2 , 0) · 1 = 198 . Part (b): f (2 , 1) · 1 + f (3 , 1) · 1 + f (2 , 0) · 1 + f (3 , 0) · 1 + f (2 , 1) · 1 + f (3 , 1) · 1 = 480 . The average of the two answers is 335, fairly close to the exact value 312 of the integral. 13.1.2: Part (a): f (1 , 1) · 1 + f (2 , 1) · 1 + f (1 , 0) · 1 + f (2 , 0) · 1 + f (1 , 1) · 1 + f (2 , 1) · 1 = 144 . Part (b): f (2 , 2) · 1 + f (3 , 2) · 1 + f (2 , 1) · 1 + f (3 , 1) · 1 + f (2 , 0) · 1 + f (3 , 0) · 1 = 570 . The average of the two answers is 357, fairly close to the exactly value 312 of the integral. The computations shown here can be automated in computer algebra systems. For example, in Mathematica , after defining f ( x, y ) = 4 x 3 + 6 xy 2 , you could proceed as follows. x[i ] := i + 1; y[j ] := j - 2; deltax = x[1] - x[0]; deltay = y[1] - y[0]; ( Part (a): ) xstar[i ] := x[i-1]; ystar[j ] := y[j] Sum[ Sum[ f[xstar[i],ystar[j]] deltax deltay, { j, 1, 3 } , { i, 1, 2 } ] 144 ( Part (b): ) xstar[i ] := x[i]; ystar[j ] := y[j-1] Sum[ Sum[ f[xstar[i],ystar[j]] deltax deltay, { j, 1, 3 } , { i, 1, 2 } ] 570 The idea is that to work another such problem, all you need to do is redefine f , xstar and ystar , and the limits on i and j . 13.1.3: We omit ∆ x and ∆ y from the computation because each is equal to 1. f ( 1 2 , 1 2 ) + f ( 3 2 , 1 2 ) + f ( 1 2 , 3 2 ) + f ( 3 2 , 3 2 ) = 8 . 1654

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is also the exact value of the iterated integral. 13.1.4: We omit ∆ x and ∆ y from the computation because each is equal to 1. f ( 1 2 , 1 2 ) + f ( 3 2 , 1 2 ) + f ( 1 2 , 3 2 ) + f ( 3 2 , 3 2 ) = 4 . This is also the exact value of the iterated integral. In a Mathematica solution similar to the one in Problem 2, we would use xstar[i ] := (x[i] + x[i-1])/2; ystar[j ] := (y[j] + y[j-1])/2 13.1.5: The Riemann sum is f (2 , 1) · 2 + f (4 , 1) · 2 + f (2 , 0) · 2 + f (4 , 0) · 2 = 88 . The true value of the integral is 416 3 138 . 666666666667. 13.1.6: We omit ∆ x = 1 and ∆ y = 1 from the computation. f (1 , 1) + f (2 , 1) + f (1 , 2) + f (2 , 2) + f (1 , 3) + f (2 , 3) = 43 . The true value of the integral is 26. The midpoint approximation gives the fairly close Riemann sum 25. 13.1.7: We factor out of each term in the sum the product ∆ x · y = 1 4 π 2 . The Riemann sum then takes the form 1 4 π 2 · f ( 1 4 π, 1 4 π ) + f ( 3 4 π, 1 4 π ) + f ( 1 4 π, 3 4 π ) + f ( 3 4 π, 3 4 π ) = 1 2 π 2 4 . 935 . The true value of the integral is 4. 13.1.8: We factor out of each term in the sum the product ∆ x · y = 1 6 π . The Riemann sum then takes the form 1 6 π · f ( 1 4 , 1 6 π ) + f ( 3 4 , 1 6 π ) + f ( 1 4 , 1 2 π ) + f ( 3 4 , 1 2 π ) + f ( 1 4 , 5 6 π ) + f ( 3 4 , 5 6 π ) = 1 2 π 1 . 571 . Mathematica reports that the true value of the integral is - 1 4 CosIntegral[4 π ] + 1 4 (EulerGamma + Log[4 π ]) and when we asked for a numerical value with the command N[ % ] , it returned the approximation 0 . 77858913775068568 1655
13.1.9: Because f ( x, y ) = x 2 y 2 is increasing in both the positive x -direction and the positive y -direction on [1 , 3] × [2 , 5], L M U . 13.1.10: Because f ( x, y ) = 100 x 2 y 2 is decreasing in both the positive x -direction and the positive y -direction on [1 , 4] × [2 , 5], U M L .

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern