Midterm SOS 237 package

# For example we should know or be able to work out and

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: rst, but our strategy is to try to ﬁnd points at which we know the value of and without a calculator. For example, we should know or be able to work out , , and so on. We know how to handle odd multiples of (it is , , , we look ), and we are given , whose denominator happens to be a multiple of . Writing for an odd multiple of that will be approximately 9.5. Even making the estimate that , we have . Deﬁne given by . Recall we showed in example 15 the linear approximation at is The calculator gives us a value of about , for an error of about . E XERCISE 9. Calculate the following approximately (compare with the calculator value): (a) (b) . at . Notation: For and a point , deﬁne By rearranging in the linear approximation formula, 12 WATERLOO SOS E XAM -AID: MATH237 which in our new notation becomes That is, we have a formula for the approximate change in increment form of the linear approximation formula. due to a change . We call this the E XERCISE 10. Suppose a triangle has two sides (say and ) of length 1 m, and the angle between them is . If is increased by 1 cm and decreases by 1 cm, estimate the change in area. The linear approximation formula becomes unwieldy when generalizing to higher dimensions. To help us out, we introduce a new deﬁnition. D EFINITION 7.3. Let . The gradient of at is deﬁned by D EFINITION 7.4. For we deﬁne the linear approximation of at by We write for sufﬁciently close to . In the increment form, we have for sufﬁciently close to zero. ( .) , and E XERCISE 11. Deﬁne linear approximation for by at . . Find the gradient of and the E XERCISE 12. Use linear approximation to estimate . Compare with the calculator value. 8 Differentiability (5.1) and had for sufﬁciently close In the last section, we deﬁned the linear approximation of to , where It is a natural question to ask: how good is the approximation? D EFINITION 8.1. The error in the linear approximation is deﬁned by 13 We will consider how large error is relatively small. T HEOREM 8.2. If and WATERLOO SOS E XAM -AID: MATH237 is compared to the displacement . In one variable, we see the exists, then . We use this idea to deﬁne an analogous notion of differentiability in higher dimensions. D EFINITION 8.3. A function is differentiable at such that if and only if there is a linear function where Fortunately, all our work with linear approximation has not been in vain. T HEOREM 8.4. If is differentiable at then is the linear approximation of at , i.e. R EMARK 8.5. (a) Thus to prove with linear function and . is differentiable, we simply need to prove , where (b) To prove it is not differentiable, either this limit is not , or the partial derivatives of even exist (and so the linear approximation does not exist). don’t is (c) This theorem also tells us that the linear approximation for is a good approximation if differentiable, that is, the error goes to faster than the magnitude of the displacement. E XAMPLE 17. Let be deﬁned by if if Determine whether is differentiable at . exist. Recall from S OLUTION. We ﬁrst check if exists, that is, if the partial derivatives at example 13 that they do (or work it out again), and 14 Since , the linear approximation is WATERLOO SOS E XAM -AID: MATH237 , and the error is if if and the magnitude of displacement is Now along the line , we have so by deﬁnition, is not differentiable at . E XERCISE 13. Deﬁne . Prove that is differentiable at Contrast this to the case in single variable, when is differentiable at , yet not at yet not at . . Now that we have the deﬁnition of differentiability, we can give a formal deﬁnit...
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 11/30/2010 for the course MATH 235/237 taught by Professor Wilkie during the Spring '10 term at Waterloo.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online