Outline 1 GIDEONS TRUMPET

Outline 1 GIDEONS TRUMPET - Outline 1 W ednesday, September...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Introduction Poor nobody who was in and out of jail 1) Classic have not i. Went on to supreme court to secure the right of attorny for millions ii. This article will analize galantners employing the gideon case as a venue to display the false dichotomy of haves and have not s. iii. Relate to Galanter's article a. Case summery 1. Gideon is the exempliary OS he has zero resources, complete ignorence and the stakes are incredibly high (his freedom). a. The state prosicutor is the polar opposite, he is an RP this is his job and he is good at it. b. Here galanters dichotamy holds up everyone fit the part c. Giddeon doesn’t meet Galanter's OS description the moment he begins to appeal Galanter doesn’t account for Gideon's new capitol ----time Case one 2. Gideon's appointed representation According to Galanter Giddeon is still an OS however with abe fortas he now looks and plays like and RP a. counter arg- (1)abe fortas still had to consider giddeons affairs before betts v braidy (2) abe fortas did have an episodic isolated history with G. none the less fortas had institutonal ties and backing (friends of the court )
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/29/2010 for the course POSC 130g taught by Professor Below during the Fall '06 term at USC.

Page1 / 2

Outline 1 GIDEONS TRUMPET - Outline 1 W ednesday, September...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online