This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Economics 104A Solution for Final Exam Winter 2007 1. Jack lives in SB and is considering a move to LA because prices for some goods are lower there. In all other respects, he is indifferent between the two cities. Jack consumes two goods: good 1 and good 2. Good 1 and good 2 are priced in SB twice as high as they are priced in LA. Jack has a utility function u ( x 1 , x 2 ) = ln x 1 + ln x 2 and his weekly income is I , which will not change if he moves. a) (4pt) At least by how much must Jacks income increase in SB to make him willing to remain there? Answer: The optimal bundle is always an interior bundle regardless of what the prices and income are because of the logarithmic form of the utility function. Thus, given prices p 1 , p 2 and given income I , the optimal bundle is determined by x 2 x 1 = p 1 p 2 (1) and p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 = I. (2) Solve (1) and (2), we have x 1 ( p, I ) = I/ 2 p 1 and x 2 ( p, I ) = I/ 2 p 2 (3) as the demand functions for Jack. Let p L 1 and p L 2 denote the prices in LA and p B 1 and p B 2 those in SB. Then, using demand functions in (3), Jacks utility level in LA is u L = ln I 2 2 1 p L 1 p L 2 . Denote by I S the least income that makes Jack willing to remain in SB. Then, we must have u S = ln I S 2 2 1 p S 1 p S 2 = ln I 2 2 1 p L 1 p L 2 . Since p S 1 = 2 p L 1 and p S 2 = 2 p L 2 , the above equation implies I S = 2 I . So, Jacks income must be doubled in order to make him willing to stay in SB....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 12/04/2010 for the course ECE 134 taught by Professor York during the Fall '08 term at UCSB.
 Fall '08
 York

Click to edit the document details