This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Introduction Animal Populations -> predator-prey model- As pop. Of prey (hares) increases, pop. Of predator (lynx) increases- As pop. Of predator increases, pop. Of prey decreases, thereby causing pop. Of predator to decrease Feedback mechanism-> forces which bring numbers back into line with capacity of local environment to support them What about human populations? Does the same thing happen? Thomas Malthus (pg 103- 104) professor of history and political economy- Influence of his book e.g. Darwin, (progress and survival of the fittest)- Basic ideas of Malthuss argument: o Food supply increases in a linear fashion 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. o Population increases in a geometric fashion (exponential) 1, 2, 3, 4, 16 etc. o As a result, population growth will ultimately create stress on the means of subsistence, i.e. it will exceed the carrying capacity of the environment, resulting in war, vice, and misery i.e. natural checks that limit further population increases Was Malthus correct? What does the evidence suggest?Was Malthus correct?...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 12/05/2010 for the course MATH 1Z04 taught by Professor Childs during the Spring '08 term at McMaster University.
- Spring '08