phil001notesWeek9 - Dr Mcs Philosophy 001(1091 Lecture...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1091001notesWeek9 © 1 Dr Mc’s Philosophy 001 (1091) Lecture Notes, Week 9 © Arguments and Testimony We often rely on the words of others when deciding what to believe. That is, we accept a statement on the basis of somebody else’s “testimony”. This is often okay! Can you imagine what it would be like not to take anybody’s word for anything? - You’d have to open a can of soup before you bought it, just to see if it had in it what the label said. - You’d have to go to foreign countries to learn anything about them. -You would have to create your own measuring instruments. Language is important to us in part because it allows us to transmit information. What we should be concerned with is whether the case we are considering is one in which testimony is not good evidence. There are two main ways in which testimony plays a role. 1) in testimonial arguments 2) in support of premises of non-testimonial arguments. 1) Testimonial arguments. A testimonial argument is one in which the main premise is that somebody has said that P, and whose conclusion is P. 1. S said that P [is true]. 2. P [is true]. [Saying that P= saying that P is true.] There is a missing premise here, needed to make this argument’s cogency apparent. Standard Pattern #1 for Testimonial Arguments: 1. S said that P is true. 2. Usually, when someone says that something is true, it is true. 3. P is true. (or simply “P”.) But does this cover all we’d like to see covered? What about that used car salesperson .... Standard Pattern #2 for Testimonial Arguments: 1. S said that P is true. 2. S was sincere in saying that P is true. 3. Usually, when someone sincerely says that P is true, P is true. 4. P (is true).
Image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon